buylotrogold

Global Warming and the Science Fair Test By Andrew Thomas ameicanthinker.com Hypothesis: If the Nobel Prize-winning IPCC scientists submitted their climate change research as a grade-school science fair project, it would fail miserably. Of course, my hypothesis rests on some assumptions. The first is that science will continue to be taught in our public schools, since some forward-thinkers at Berkeley High School seem to think that lab science is just for whites. The second assumption is that the science fair judges (usually teachers) are unbiased toward climate change science and actually understand the scientific method. This is a tall assumption, since global warming propaganda is more and more becoming part of the curricula they teach, while the scientific method takes a back seat. To support my hypothesis, I use as my reference Understanding and using The Scientific Method, a how-to guide to school science fair projects from Sciencemadesimple.com: The Scientific Method is a logical and rational order of steps by which scientists come to conclusions about the world around them. [...] Scientists use observations, hypotheses, and deductions to make these conclusions, just like you will use the Scientific Method in your science fair project. The first step of the process is Observation : For this stage of the Scientific Method, it's important to use as many sources as you can find. The more information you have on your science fair project topic, the better the design of your experiment is going to be ... How well did the IPCC do in collecting the observations that have been used to develop their hypothesis? Well, the term cherry-picking seems apropos. None of their erstwhile scientific observations have included solar cycle or water vapor data, or the sixteen other sources of climate change