buylotrogold

No,  I  mean  it  quite  literally.  What  people  should  do  is consult  the  material  which has  been  quoted  and  referenced. They'll  probably  find  that this changes  what  they  know.  My experience  over the past 10 years suggests that  people  confuse their own restricted beliefs with what is actually known. The wonderful thing about the net is that it makes it possible to advertise ideas that in the old days would have never been allowed to see the light of day.  However, as with all advertising, you have to give the public a _reason_ to act on your information. I really mean it (as in not intending to be flippant or in any way demeaning) when I say I have been reading your posts for some two years now and, not only do I not understand what your position is (e.g., the extensional stance has never been clearly explained or justified in simple English), but the only argument I have ever been given for acting on your advertisement which _is_ simple and clear has been the argument from authority (Trust me, I'm a professional). Since I have spent most of my life with what is perhaps an almost irrational _disdain_ for authority, and since I presume it to be a fairly commonplace attitude out here in cyberland, I believe it is reasonable to conclude that the problem is not so much with me, Mr. John Q. Public, (assuming I am typical of your intended audience