buylotrogold

I'm new to this newsgroup.  Do radical behaviorists ever show up here?  

  I'm new to this newsgroup.  Do radical behaviorists ever show   up here?   No, electronic news conferences is too novel; they haven't been conditioned to using them yet. More seriously, not for the last four years that I've been reading this group.

I'm new to this newsgroup.  Do radical behaviorists ever show up here?   Not if we can shout them down first . Though Jon Kruger was a regular contributer.

Not many radical behaviorists seem to read this newsgroup, at least none that I recognize, and I amn reasonably familiar with the community.  I believe there is a compuserve BBS that is set up for radical behaviorists, but I'm not sure how to log on it.  On the other hand, not much that goes on here is central to radical behaviorist concerns Jay Moore Dept. of Psychology University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

On the other hand, not much that goes on here is central to radical behaviorist concerns Can radical behaviorists have concerns, or do they only have dispositions to act in a concerned manner (oops, sorry, that's *logical* behaviorism, isn't it?).

From my point of view (i.e., on the basis of my reinforcement history , my concern is a matter of whether the messages of the net are of sufficient value to make my life better, as a parent, teacher, or even in resolving the many things that puzzle me.  I was really intrigued a few months back by the thread on the relation between psychology and physiology.  The comp.ai.* newsgroup seems to get going from time to time on this thread, sometimes getting into type-identities and token- identities.  Maybe we should reinvigorate this thread.  I'm not sure the philosophers were doing it justice.  Too bad Harvard limited Mikhail Zeleny's account (or maybe he's out there now, even as I type). No doubt he would contribute.